Abstraction Health

Creatine

Amino Acid Derivative

Also known as: Creatine Monohydrate

🟢Strong Evidence 21 expert mentions 20 studies referenced

One of the most researched supplements. Supports ATP regeneration, muscle strength, and cognitive function.

Common forms:monohydrateHCl

How expert claims hold up

21 of 21 claims assessed
1Supported14Partial6Insufficient

15 of 21 assessed claims supported or partially supported by published research

Evidence Summary

PubMed / NCBI·May 2026
All 20 studies
20
Studies
4
RCTs
10
Reviews

Several important caveats temper the overall picture. The majority of articles in this collection are reviews and meta-analyses rather than individual RCTs, which means the evidence is partly dependent on the quality of the underlying primary studies those reviews synthesized — details about individual study populations, sample sizes, and specific findings were not available for evaluation here. Key populations such as women, children, and adolescents are represented only by narrative reviews, not meta-analyses or large RCTs, meaning recommendations for these groups rest on weaker evidence. Timing of creatine supplementation around exercise is explored in one review but remains an open question without definitive answers. Long-term safety data beyond typical study durations is also limited, and most cognitive benefit research focuses on short-term outcomes in healthy populations rather than clinical groups. The precise mechanisms underlying potential brain benefits, while mechanistically plausible, have not been fully established in human intervention trials.

Read full evidence summary →

Top studies

Effects of creatine supplementation on memory in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Nutrition reviews · 2023 · Prokopidis K et al.
Meta-Analysis🟢
Key finding

Effects of creatine supplementation on memory in healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PMID: 35984306DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac064
View on PubMed

Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Renal Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2019 · de Souza E Silva A et al.
Meta-Analysis🟢
Key finding

Effects of Creatine Supplementation on Renal Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

PMID: 31375416DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2019.05.004
View on PubMed

Expert Mentions

All 21 mentions
Andrew Huberman
Stanford School of Medicine / Huberman Lab· PhD, Neuroscience
Caution / warning

"people with pre-existing kidney disease should consult a physician before supplementing, as creatine does increase creatinine levels in blood, which can confound kidney function tests even in healthy people."

Extracted claim

People with pre-existing kidney disease should consult a physician before supplementing with creatine, as creatine increases creatinine levels in the blood, which can confound kidney function tests even in healthy people.

Partially supportedHigh extraction confidence

The expert's claim contains two distinct components: (1) that creatine supplementation raises blood creatinine levels, which can confound kidney function tests even in healthy individuals, and (2) that those with pre-existing kidney disease should consult a physician. The meta-analysis on renal function (PMID: 31375416, strong quality) and the review on renal function effects (PMID: 31859895, moderate quality) are the most relevant sources, but none of the provided studies include explicit key findings or population details, limiting direct verification. The creatinine-confounding concern is a well-established mechanistic consequence of creatine metabolism and is generally consistent with the broader scientific literature, but cannot be directly confirmed from the evidence summaries provided. The caution for kidney disease patients is a reasonable clinical recommendation, but the absence of extractable findings from these studies prevents full confirmation.

Peter Attia
Early Medical / The Drive Podcast· MD
Caution / warning

"creatine supplementation raises serum creatinine, which is used as a proxy for kidney function. This doesn't indicate kidney damage in healthy people, but it will confuse your doctor if they see the lab value. Always disclose supplementation."

Extracted claim

Creatine supplementation raises serum creatinine, which is used as a proxy for kidney function; this does not indicate kidney damage in healthy people but can confuse lab interpretation, so supplementation should always be disclosed to one's doctor.

Partially supportedHigh extraction confidence

The expert's claim aligns with well-established physiological principles — creatine is metabolized to creatinine, and supplementation is known to elevate serum creatinine — but the provided research summaries contain no extractable key findings, populations, or limitations, making direct evidentiary linkage impossible. PMID 31375416 and 31859895 are directly relevant meta-analyses and reviews on creatine and renal function, which would typically support the claim that creatinine elevation does not indicate kidney damage in healthy individuals, but their specific findings are not reported here. The claim's practical recommendation to disclose supplementation to one's physician is clinically reasonable but is not directly evidenced by the studies listed. Because the underlying biology is sound and relevant studies exist in the list (even if their findings are unavailable), the claim is partially supported rather than unsupported.

Key findings

  • ·Multiple meta-analyses consistently show that creatine supplementation combined with resistance training increases muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in adults under 50.
  • ·A meta-analysis of RCTs found that creatine supplementation improves memory performance in healthy individuals, suggesting cognitive benefits beyond athletic use.
  • ·A daily maintenance dose of 3–5 grams of creatine monohydrate is the most commonly described protocol across the reviewed literature.

Evidence gaps

  • ·Evidence for women, children, and adolescents comes only from narrative reviews — not meta-analyses or large RCTs — leaving recommendations for these groups on shakier ground.
  • ·Long-term safety data (beyond typical short study durations) and cognitive benefit research in clinical populations remain limited, making it difficult to generalize findings broadly.
  • ·The optimal timing of creatine supplementation around exercise has not been resolved, with the available review-level evidence suggesting it may matter less than total daily intake but stopping short of a definitive conclusion.